Capital Punishment Should Be Banned From Bangladesh Philosophy Essay

Capital punishment Should Be Banned From Bangladesh Philosophy EssayAccording to great author and noble prize winner writer George Bernard Shaw, says that Capital Punishment is a vague term. He illustrates the victims as mad dogs, cobras or adders which causes ill to our society. Either we should hide them or educate them to become suitable for remaining in the society. The real problem is the turn you cannot reform the human mad dog or cobra. The answer is, kill him kindly and apologetically, if possible with discover understanding on his part. Let him go comfortably to bed expecting to wake up in the morning as usual, and not wake up. His general consciousness that this may happen to him should be sh ared by every citizen as part of his moral civic responsibility.There is a considerable class of mortals who become criminals because they cannot endure for themselves, but who under tutelage, superintendence, and provided sustenance are self- birthing and even profitable citi zens. They make good infantry soldiers and well-be studyd prisoners. But throw them out into the channel and they are presently in the dock. They in addition present no problem. Reorganize their lives for them and do not prate foolishly about their liberty.Capital punishment is the devastation penalty effrontery by the government of a country, to spate who submit committed hideous horrors like homicide, rape, etc. Capital punishment has been a federal agency of punishing flock since ages. Although there are some countries that have abolished stopping point penalty from their faithfulness, there are still many which still pr behaveice the act of killing a person for horror. Capital punishment is prevalent in the US, Asian and Middle Eastern countries. Some of the ways of executing criminals are hanging, shooting, burn and braggy lethal injections.People have different opinions on the issue of jacket punishment given to a convict. While some think that final stage pen alty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are opposites who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity.Pros of Capital Punishment ( Taken from a website and edited in a very small amount because all statements are self-explanatory)A person who has committed a crime like killing or raping another person should be given last penalty, which is as severe punishment as the act. It is said that when a criminal is given a capital punishment, it dissuades others in the society from committing such serious crimes. They would refrain from such crimes due to fear of losing their lives. This would definitely help in cut crime rate in society.If a criminal is jailed, he may again commit the same crime afterwards being released from prison. Giving him capital punishment would make sure that the society is safe from being attacked by criminals. It seems to be an appropriate punishment for serial killers and for those who continue to comm it crimes even after serving imprisonment.Some study that instead of announcing life imprisonment for the convicts, where they would have to live a futile life behind closed bars, it is separate to kill them. It is said that imprisoning someone is more expensive than executing him. Rather than spending on a person who may again commit terrifying crime, it is better to put him to destruction.Capital punishment is equated as revenge for pain and suffering that the criminal inflicted on the victim. Some people strongly believe that a person who has taken the life of another person does not have a chastise to live. Sentencing such a criminal can give relief to the family members of the victim that their loved one has obtained justice.It is also important for the safety of fellow prison inmates and guards, as people who commit unworthy crimes like murder are believed to have a violent personality and may, in future, attack someone during imprisonment. These reasons emphasize the imp ortance of capital punishment for the betterment of human society. However, there is another component of people who believe that it is an immoral and unethical act of violence.Cons of Capital PunishmentIf we execute a person, what is the difference between us and the criminal who has committed the horrifying crime of killing another individual.Capital punishment is not always just and appropriate. Usually, it has been seen that poor people have to succumb to shoemakers last penalty as they cannot afford good lawyers to defend their stance. There are very rare cases of rich people being pronounced capital punishment. Also, an individual from minority communities are more likely to be given wipeout penalty.Every human being is entitled to receive a second chance in life. putting a convict behind bars is always a logical option than killing him, as there is a chance that he may improve. People who have served life sentences are reported to have bettered their earlier ways of livin g and have made worthwhile contribution to the society.There is also a chance that an individual is innocent and is wrongly charged for a crime he has never committed. There have been cases where individuals were released after being given death sentence, because they were proved innocent. There are also cases where a persons innocence was proved after he was put to death. Hence, it is best to avoid executing a person.It is reported that there is no relation between capital punishment and crime rate i.e giving death penalty does not decrease crime rate in the society. Crimes are prevalent in countries where capital punishment exists and also where it has been abolished.Bangladesh Perspective and My OpinionBangladesh is a country where there is no right to life. By the various way this right has been violating there. The causes of violation to this right are death penalty, extra judicial killings etc. Here is a common work of death penalty and killings without justice. Every year ma ny peoples are killed by death penalty and by the extra judicial killings. How many people have killed since independence to till today we dont have this statistics. It is no doubt that, death penalty is one kind of killing.Recently five persons were killed in death penalty within a day in Bangladesh. On 28th January, 2010 Bangladesh was executed this death penalty which decision was made by the Bangladesh Supreme Court. The killed persons were self say killers of Bangabondhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Bangabondhu is the father of the nation of Bangladesh. Though, question has arisen on the execution procedure of this death penalty.I want to inform some statistics on Bangladesh to the national and worldwide community. Especially it for the human rights organization and bodies which are working national and international level for the human rights. We have been seeing and reading the news on death penalty al some every week from Bangladesh which was declared by several courts for vario us charges.Only by extra judicially at least 1,600 people were killed in Bangladesh since 2004. 58 persons were killed during the Operation clean heart in 2002 led by army. We couldnt remember the horrible mass killings in so-called mutiny at BDR headquarters on 25-26 February, 2009. By that mutiny at least 74 were killed inhumanly including 57 meritorious army officers. After that mutiny at least 71 BDR members was died (Source the daily Bhorer Kagoj, 25 February, 2010). Most of the died BDR were tortured before death, it was alleged.Anyhow, execution of death penalty is very inhuman, degrading and cruel. And no where it approved. Especially it is prohibited by the record and the Universal Declaration for Human Rights. But, Bangladesh has executing the death penalty as normal.According to the Spinney Press, The UN reaffirmed and strengthened its position against the death penalty in December 2007 when the prevalent Assembly passed a resolution calling upon member states to establ ish a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty. Evidence from around the world has shown that the death penalty has no unique deterrent effect on crime. Many people have argued that abolishing the death penalty leads to higher crime rates, but studies in the USA and Canada, for instance, do not back this up. In November 2009 the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Torture Prohibition and Death Penalty Abolition) Bill 2009 was introduced before the House of Representatives. The legislation fulfils Australias obligations under the secant Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which requires Australia to take all necessary measures to abolish the death penalty. As a consequence, the death penalty will not be able to be re-introduced anywhere in Australia. Although the world is gradually moving towards abolition of capital punishment, in 2008 an estimated 1,718 people were executed in 25 countries and at least 8,864 people w ere sentenced to death in 52 countries. Three quarters of those executions took built in bed in Asia, with China carrying out more executions than the rest of the worlds nations put together. Since 1967 when the last Australian (Ronald Ryan) was hanged, the Australia has maintained a policy of opposition to the death penalty. (It was written in the book-The death penalty).According to this book, most of the executions in 2008 were carried out in Asia, where 11 countries continue to practise the death penalty Afghanistan, Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Japan, North Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, Pakistan, Singapore, and Viet Nam. China alone accounted for at least 1,718 executions although the figure is believed to be much higher as statistics on death sentences and executions remain state secrets. The Middle East and North Africa was the region with the second highest number of executions (508). In Iran, stoning and hanging were among the cruel and inhumane methods used, with at least 346 people put to death, including eight juvenile offenders. In Saudi Arabia, where execution is usually by open beheading, at least 102 people were executed. In the Americas, just now the USA consistently executes people, with 37 executions carried out in 2008 including more in Texas than in any other state. The release of four men from death row in the USA on grounds of innocence brings to more than 120 the number of such cases released since 1975. The only other country in the Americas to execute in 2008 was St Kitts and Nevis, the initiative Caribbean state to carry out an execution since 2003.According to the Amnesty International, 93 percents of the world death penalty has executed in China including other four countries. DW-Bengali online section writes (25-2-2010), the European magnetic north was published a declaration on an anti-death penalty. Europe is the first place which is a death penalty free. A proposal of European on anti-death penalty in the Human Rights Commi ssion of Geneva and general manufacturing of UNO in 1998, was spoiled by the contradictory of USA, China, Africa and some countries of Asia. Though, in 2007 that proposal was passed in general assembly of UNO. And the 58 percents people of China are support to death penalty. In the meanspirited time 93 countries have already abolished to death penalty by making the law. At least 141 country havent giving death penalty, now.We know the Italy has a historical background on anti-death penalty movement. So, we want to thanks and salute to the Italy as well as the countries of European Union for their dedications to the right to life and for the human rights.Our hope, Bangladesh should obey to national and international treaties and declaration for human rights. And Bangladesh government should abolish the death penalty system immediately. If they have believe a little bit on human rights.Islamic PerspectiveIf anyone kills a person unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land it would be as if he killed all people. And if anyone saves a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all people ( record 532). manner is sacred, according to Islam and most other world faiths. But how can one hold life sacred, yet still support capital punishment? The Quran answers, Take not life, which God has made sacred, except by way of justice and law. Thus does He command you, so that you may learn acquaintance (6151).The key point is that one may take life only by way of justice and law. In Islam, therefore, the death penalty can be applied by a court as punishment for the most serious of crimes. Ultimately, ones eternal punishment is in Gods hands, but there is a place for punishment in this life as well. The spirit of the Islamic penal code is to save lives, promote justice, and prevent corruption and tyranny.Islamic philosophy holds that a harsh punishment serves as a deterrent to serious crimes that harm individual victims, or threaten to destabilize the foundation of society. According to Islamic law (in the first verse quoted above), the following two crimes can be punishable by deathIntentional murderFasad fil-ardh (spreading mischief in the land)Intentional carrying into actionThe Quran legislates the death penalty for murder, although forgiveness and compassion are strongly encouraged. The murder victims family is given a choice to either insist on the death penalty, or to pardon the perpetrator and accept monetary compensation for their loss (2178).Fasaad fi al-ardhThe second crime for which capital punishment can be applied is a bit more open to interpretation. Spreading mischief in the land can mean many different things, but is generally interpreted to mean those crimes that affect the community as a whole, and destabilize the society. Crimes that have fallen under this description have includedTreason / Apostacy (when one leaves the faith and joins the adversary in fighting against the Muslim community)TerrorismLand, sea , or air piracyRapeAdulteryHomosexual behaviorActual methods of capital punishment veer from place to place. In some Muslim countries, methods have included beheading, hanging, stoning, and firing squad. Executions are held publicly, to serve as warnings to would-be criminals.It is important to note that there is no place for vigilantism in Islam one must be properly convicted in an Islamic court of law before the punishment can be meted out. The bad weather of the punishment requires that very strict evidence standards must be met before a conviction is found. The court also has flexibility to order less than the ultimate punishment (for example, imposing fines or prison sentences), on a case-by-case basis.At the end I want to say that Capital Punishment is necessary, if the home is applicable. This is not unethical or immoral but it has to be seen that the griminal is passes with ease and relief.